Posted 31 October 2011 - 06:11 PM
Posted 01 November 2011 - 03:41 AM
A photo KWA posted to fb a couple months ago. And for comparison, here's the realsteel:
Posted 01 November 2011 - 02:13 PM
Posted 01 November 2011 - 03:37 PM
Posted 01 November 2011 - 03:54 PM
I would ASSUME that KWA would make a low powered bolt for the Vector just like they are with the MP7, MP9 and LM4 series...
I don't think KWA indicated the targeted FPS for this gun. I know a lot of the NS2 driven guns tend to push over CQB limits, but it is possible to stay CQB friendly (see KZ75).
Posted 01 November 2011 - 07:47 PM
Posted 02 November 2011 - 06:15 AM
Posted 02 November 2011 - 06:00 PM
Posted 02 November 2011 - 07:51 PM
Posted 02 November 2011 - 07:58 PM
Posted 03 November 2011 - 11:46 AM
Posted 03 November 2011 - 03:54 PM
Posted 03 November 2011 - 06:03 PM
Posted 04 November 2011 - 07:44 AM
Not sure I understand the logic here, no matter what the gun is, a higher velocity gun is better for MILSIM, as airsoft guns aren't exactly close in velocity to real firearms.
I am sorry I didn't clarify (I was referring to outdoor field games), the logic is more firearm bullet caliber Vs airsoft bb weight. For the sake of argument, the logic ignores FPS = Distance, but instead assumes FPS = BB Weight, as the closest comparison we can make to bullet calibers is BB weight. With that logic, the higher the FPS, the higher BB weight you can use. As most fields have a upper limit of max of 400 FPS for full auto, with the average recommended BB weight being .25, which typically falls in the domain with rifles that would have their real steel counterparts shooting .223 and 7.62 rounds. The problem I was trying to illustrate was that with the MP9, Mac 11 and other KWA NS2 / FV engine guns shooting 400 FPS and using .25 BBs places them in the domain of "simulation" rifle rounds. I could expand this a little further with card gaming logic and the balance issues it raises, if you wanted
Posted 04 November 2011 - 07:53 AM
Posted 07 November 2011 - 06:14 AM
Edited by Oceanpelt, 07 November 2011 - 06:15 AM.
Posted 08 November 2011 - 11:40 AM
Btw, I agree that the KRISS should shoot 400+, but then again, I think all airsoft guns could use a good deal more FPS. More FPS would significantly enhance the realism of the sport. I think the notion that getting shot in-game isn't a big deal at all (pain-wise) detracts significantly from the enjoyability of the airsoft experience.
Posted 08 November 2011 - 03:59 PM
Posted 10 November 2011 - 03:15 AM
Posted 10 November 2011 - 12:47 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users